It lays out my concern that the United Nations is nothing more than the nascent government for the New World Order / Globalist Society being forced upon us by our politicians.
America must do as the UK did from the EU - one of the five region/states promoted by the Globalists. We must "Brexit" from the UN and from NAFTA if we want to keep our sovereignty. By doing that, by shedding the shackles imposed upon us over the past thirty-five years, we will become truly free again, and will be positioned to provide a guiding light for the rest of the industrialized world.
If Hillary Clinton becomes President, our nation will cease to be. Obama has already handed over internet freedom to the United Nations. Clinton will have the Supreme Court and will strip our Constitution from us. The Second Amendment will be the first to fall - our insurance policy against governmental tyranny. Next will be the First Amendment, then the others, one-by-one, until we are laid bare.
There is no reason to doubt that the UN will begin exercising internet censorship if Hillary is elected. It fits with the UN 2030 Agenda - which lays out, in kindly terms, their plan for subverting free peoples and free nations to a One World Government.
The other day I posted and ranted about the UN's Agenda 2030 - a document that smacks of a manifesto about how they're going to take over the world. Reading that and thinking about it, it seems clear to me that the United Nations is intent on becoming the One World Government, Constitutions and national sovereignty be damned.
According to their Agenda, immigration is necessary and nations should cooperate and even encourage it.
Nation states should not do anything independently. If they want to enter into a trade agreement or do something that will benefit the citizens of their country financially or economically, that nation state is required, under the terms of this agreement, to get it approved by the Pinky & The Brain Society for World Domination (hereinafter called "the UN").
Along with the manifesto there were a smattering of references to other documents. Reading them it's not as overtly concerning as I expected. Most deal with the lofty goals of bringing undeveloped countries forward. African nations, land-locked nations (like Lichtenstein, one of the wealthiest countries in the world, no doubt), and other "deserving" countries. It sounds as if it's all about helping them to become self-sustaining and peaceful. And as I said the other day, those are lofty, admirable and worthy goals. They're not realistic goals given what's going on around the world these days, but they are worthy.
Can we say Boko Haram and mass murder? How about Daesh or ISIS or ISIL or IS or whatever the hell the name du jour is for those vermin who are killing and raping with abandon. Al Qaeda or Taliban or any of the many offshoots are in there, too. Given the violence running rampant through much of the world, the worldwide peace called for in Agenda 2030 looks to be very pie in the sky right now.
Despite the worthiness of its ideals, I do hope, for the the benefit of citizens everywhere, that the UN doesn't set itself up as The One World Government. Having people govern themselves locally is much better for the individual than people living under one-size fits all totalitarianism or tyranny, which is what I fear the UN's vision for the world would quickly become.
However, I do hope they manage to bring peace and prosperity to all. I'm still not sure how they're going to do it given the (I stand corrected because I said six the other day) more than seven billion people wandering around this planet and the limited resources of clean water and food. Good on them if they can, though.
Well, I said I would go back and read through some of those documents. Truth is, I skimmed. I skimmed several carefully, an in-depth skim rather than a skim-skim, and I gleaned some interesting information. Nothing about widespread eugenics or life productivity charts that show where medical resources should be applied (which was a cause of some widespread conspiracy theories back in 2008-2009).
One of the documents I looked at is called the Addis Ababa Action Agenda. Googling it brought me a selection of sites. I chose this UN page which is basically lots and lots of happy-talk about what the plan is:
Cutting through the wilderness of
verbiage (you think they use so many convoluted words and phrases so people will give up and go do
something else?), I found not much else but one significant point that comes up again and again.
Hold onto your wallet. The
tax collector is coming to get you, and it’s going to hurt:
Domestic resource mobilization is central to
the agenda. In the outcome
document, countries agreed to an array
of measures aimed at widening the revenue base, improving tax collection, and
combatting tax evasion and illicit financial flows. Countries also
reaffirmed their commitment to official development assistance, particularly
for the least developed countries…
Doncha love the convoluted phrasing?
It makes sound so benign. “Domestic resource mobilization…” * Sighs and bats eyelids at the melodious sound of it *
Oh, and that typo is theirs, not mine (mine is a direct quote, including the wart of 'combatting').
Oh, and that typo is theirs, not mine (mine is a direct quote, including the wart of 'combatting').
Now, back to the program here:
Excuse me? Just what the hell is that supposed to mean? "Domestic resource mobilization..."
This is deliberate, you know. Make it hard to read, harder to comprehend and people will give up. You can bet when these guys and gals were sitting around that table they weren’t saying (in portentous tones), “You know, domestic resource mobilization has got to be central to this agenda.”
No, it was probably more along the lines of, "You know, we are going to have to tax the hell out of people to pay for all of this. That has got to be central to this agenda."
Excuse me? Just what the hell is that supposed to mean? "Domestic resource mobilization..."
This is deliberate, you know. Make it hard to read, harder to comprehend and people will give up. You can bet when these guys and gals were sitting around that table they weren’t saying (in portentous tones), “You know, domestic resource mobilization has got to be central to this agenda.”
No, it was probably more along the lines of, "You know, we are going to have to tax the hell out of people to pay for all of this. That has got to be central to this agenda."
Bottom line is that they have deliberately made it harder to
read than it needs to be, and if you’ve reached this far it’s possible your
brain is on the verge of exploding. But I’m persistent and dogged so I made it
this far. Then read farther. Basically, they are going to create new taxes, fees, liens, assessments and levies,
reduce loopholes, and do everything possible to separate you from as much of your hard
earned money as possible so it can be given away to other countries.
The next paragraph takes it a step
farther:
The outcome document also
underscores the importance of aligning private investment with
sustainable development,
In
other words, under this grand scheme it seems that your “private”
investments wouldn't be
private anymore. You invest your money in the stock market or some other
savings vehicle and it’s not necessarily yours. Maybe it'll be like some
of the programs instituted in Greece and Cypress in the past couple of
years. You know, those policies where if you have anything more than "x"
amount of money in the bank, the government can just swoop down and
take it. They were called 'bail-ins'.
In
case you don't believe this actually happened (it did), here's an
except is from the Huffington Post (there are many other links but out
of sensitivity for those who might get hives from any of the other more
right-wing publications like Forbes or Investor's Business Daily or the
Wall Street Journal, I chose this one):
On the weekend of November 16th, the G20 leaders whisked into Brisbane, posed for their photo ops, approved some proposals, made a show of roundly disapproving of Russian President Vladimir Putin, and whisked out again. It was all so fast, they may not have known what they were endorsing when they rubber-stamped the Financial Stability Board's "Adequacy of Loss-Absorbing Capacity of Global Systemically Important Banks in Resolution," which completely changes the rules of banking.
Russell Napier, writing in ZeroHedge, called it "the day money died." In any case, it may have been the day deposits died as money. Unlike coins and paper bills, which cannot be written down or given a "haircut," says Napier, deposits are now "just part of commercial banks' capital structure." That means they can be "bailed in" or confiscated to save the megabanks from derivative bets gone wrong.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ellen-brown/new-g20-bailin-rules-now-_b_6244394.html
And, that G20 document they signed affected all banks, everywhere.
Including here in the US where we supposedly have our own national
banking regulations and restrictions. Yeah, well there went those with
nary a ripple.
So, back to the UN Agenda 2030 and Addis Ababa Action Thingie. It goes farther. It pretty much says
that on top of your local tax collector and the national tax collector, we
might end up with a UN tax collector, too. Although they won’t call it that.
They’ll figure out new ways and means and impose taxes, fees, levies,
assessments or anything else they can think of, take the money locally or
domestically, and then funnel it into the UN for redistribution. Don’t believe
me? Well, they say it right here:
Taxation—The
Agenda calls for strengthening support for the work of the UN Committee of Experts on International
Cooperation in Tax Matters to improve its effectiveness and operational
capacity,
Wunnerful. So, on top of the
twenty-some percent I pay in income tax, and the ten percent sales tax I
regularly shell out on things other than foodstuffs, and the forty percent I
pay per gallon on the gas I need to get to my job to earn the money to pay my
taxes, I get to look forward to another hand being thrust in my direction.
Well, they gotta pay for this somehow.
I kept reading but didn’t find
anything else that’s new. Just the high-falutin’ goals to which they aspire and
expect us to pay for.
I’m
still scratching my head over how they’re going to
bring everyone on this planet up to the same plane of existence. Don't
misunderstand me, please. It’s a worthy
goal and I hope they can accomplish it. I just fear that by taking and
taking and taking from those who have and giving and giving and giving
to those who don't, they'll end up dragging the rest of us down to the
level of these undeveloped countries.
Since
we have no one with a spine in Washington, and Obie-One is routinely
circumventing the protections afforded by the Constitution by issuing
decree after decree from the Oval Office, I suspect we're going to be
stuck with this whether we like it or not. So much for a Representative
Democracy.
Well. It's another case of something about which I, as an individual can do nothing so I'm not going to worry about it. I'll live my life, put one foot in front of the other for as long as I can, and keep on keepin' on. I hope you'll do the same but I do hope, if you figure out a solution to The Pinky & The Brain Society for World Domination you'll clue the rest of us in so we can join you.
If you want to read the lead-in to this, see my other post about this, here:
http://philippastories.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-pinky-brain-society-are-winding-up.html
Best~
Philippa
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhilippaStories
Well. It's another case of something about which I, as an individual can do nothing so I'm not going to worry about it. I'll live my life, put one foot in front of the other for as long as I can, and keep on keepin' on. I hope you'll do the same but I do hope, if you figure out a solution to The Pinky & The Brain Society for World Domination you'll clue the rest of us in so we can join you.
If you want to read the lead-in to this, see my other post about this, here:
http://philippastories.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-pinky-brain-society-are-winding-up.html
Best~
Philippa
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhilippaStories
No comments:
Post a Comment